FISH TANK (2009)
- Use of slang / regional dialect - Setting, run down council estate - Fighting, aggresive attitude, abusive - Shows people not working, looking for a fight - Set in Dagenham, exaggerated stereotypes based on truth - Documentary style filming, camera work - Establishing shot at beginning of clip - Costume (tracksuit, hoodie, trainers, chains, etc) - Depiction of confrontational attitude within the community - Metaphor of trying to free horse from it's chains + poor treatment from the people around it - 'Fish Tank' title suggests entrapment in the same cycle, repetitive life, no way to get out of your circumstances -
LOVE ACTUALLY (2003)
[Link to clip; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYGr2GA2EGA&list=PLEF68384428FFa5474&index=5]
- Iconic symbols and imagery shown, represent Britishness; Union Jack flag, Churchill, Shakespeare - Music playing in background is cheesy, but brings a 'victorious' atmosphere, pride - All of the famous figures mentioned were white & male - Formal language, suits and ties, upper class - Relationship between UK and USA explored, Britain depicted as small but powerful -
THIS IS ENGLAND (2006)
- Exploration of relationship between skinhead subculture and white nationalism - Shows racial abuse towards Asian shopkeeper by gang of white males of various ages - Set in the early / mid 1980's - At beginning, the graffiti is spelt wrong, shows lack of education & understanding of the 'cause' they represent - Bad language, racist language, slang - Set in Midlands or North of England? -
Monday, 21 January 2013
Sunday, 14 October 2012
Research - Representations of Mental Illness in Film *UNFINISHED*
Whilst on the internet a couple of days ago, I stumbled across an article about representations of mental illness in the media and it caught my interest. I've often heard / thought about how stereotypical and negative representations of different ethnicities and age groups can be inaccurate and damaging, however the way mental illness is represented is rarely talked about.
[article from www.timetochange.org.uk]
The article featured the opinion of psychiatrist and film expert Dr Peter Byrne, whose opinion was that representation of mental illness in film is more negative and 'crueler' than ever. He explains that he thinks recent blockbuster films such as The Dark Knight (2008) are increasingly representing sufferers of mental illnesses as violent and unpredictable; furthering negative stereotypes.
After reading the article, I thought about films that I had seen that featured characters with mental illness, and how this issue was handled within the film;
.jpg)
BLACK SWAN (2011)
[article from www.timetochange.org.uk]
After reading the article, I thought about films that I had seen that featured characters with mental illness, and how this issue was handled within the film;
THE DARK KNIGHT (2008)
Before the article, I hadn't considered the depiction of mental illness in the Dark Knight (despite the fact that is was a massively famous film, and one of my favourites) and am still not quite sure whether it can be grouped in with the other films I am going to look at. The Joker is portrayed as psychopathic and somewhat schizophrenic, with Batman describing him as 'schizophrenic' within the film. The character displays the typical negative stereotype of a schizophrenic - multiple personalities - with one of them evil, out of control and a danger to others.
.jpg)
GIRL, INTERRUPTED (1999)
Before I watched this film, I was interested in how a film where all of the main characters have a psychological problem of some sort would represent these characters. It's rare that the topic of mental illness is the focus of a film; this film follows the story of 18 year old Susannah who has just been checked into a psychiatric hospital after attempting suicide. She soon meets the other patients of the hospital, which gives the film a chance to accurately represent an array of different mental illnesses. It does reach it's potential in some respects as it shows the negative impact of ignorance on the girl's lives and it touches upon some of the less well publicised impacts of mental illness on somebody's life. However, it also features negative stereotypes, such as people with mental illness being weak, needy or manipulative and doesn't put enough into making clear that these are traits of the character, not of their illness.
BLACK SWAN (2011)
Despite the fact that 'Black Swan' is more of a psychological horror film than a film about mental illness, in my opinion it can clearly be regarded as a metaphor or exploration into this subject.
DONNIE DARKO (2001)
Another psychological horror film that depicts mental illness in a more metaphorical way, Donnie Darko is now quite popular, a 'cult' film. Scenes of Donnie speaking to his psychiatrist are scattered throughout the film, and the whole narrative of the film is seen from Donnie's perspective, meaning that the entire storyline is quite ambiguous. It blurs the line between reality through the eyes of the 'sane' viewer and reality through the eyes of Donnie, leaving the viewer in the dark as to how much of what plays out is simply a creation of his mind. It also questions whether this actually matters - if your mind is telling you that something is
Another psychological horror film that depicts mental illness in a more metaphorical way, Donnie Darko is now quite popular, a 'cult' film. Scenes of Donnie speaking to his psychiatrist are scattered throughout the film, and the whole narrative of the film is seen from Donnie's perspective, meaning that the entire storyline is quite ambiguous. It blurs the line between reality through the eyes of the 'sane' viewer and reality through the eyes of Donnie, leaving the viewer in the dark as to how much of what plays out is simply a creation of his mind. It also questions whether this actually matters - if your mind is telling you that something is
A BEAUTIFUL MIND (2001)
Summertime Sadness (Music Video)
A lot of parallels can be drawn between this video and the look / mood I want to create for our music video. The combination of character focused shots, 'past / self shot footage' and carefully selected imagery is used to build the audience's understanding of what the video is about, rather than having a clear narrative. It has a subtlety to the way it approaches it's subject matter, and this makes a very intriguing watch. The audience empathises with the 'character' without actually knowing anything about them. We feel sad for them because the combination of the music / lyrics with the slow replaying of 'video camera' footage and the shots of her falling make us reflect on our own past and what we feel we've lost.
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
Sunday, 30 September 2012
Later (Short Film)
Later from Simon Duric on Vimeo.
I found this short film on Vimeo and thought it was a very unique take on the 'zombie' subgenre.Representations of Teenagers & Collective Identity
Discuss how one or more groups of people are represented
through the media.
With the recent Paralympic games fresh in the minds of the
public, issues surrounding disability are currently in the media spotlight.
Never have people with disability been so represented on our TV screens, and
never have they been so praised for their acheivements. However, there is
debate as to whether the impact of the Paralympic games will be as positive as
first thought.
Before the Paralympics, many disabled people thought that
the public had a negative impression of them. The media focus on welfare cuts
means that a majority of the coverage of disability on TV was linked to benefit
fraud, causing a stereotype that disabled people are too lazy to work. Peter
White, the BBC’s disability correspondant, points out that ‘They cite
government plans to cut welfare benefits, and the media coverage accompanying
it which often allies "disabled" to "benefit scrounger"’.
However, with the Paralympics being so highly covered in the
media, it was hoped that this negative public opinion could be transformed into
a positive one. The International Paralympic Commitee recently revealed that the 2012 Paralympics had broke online records, with 2 million people visiting their website during the event and a 50% increase in Twitter followers. There is no doubt the Paralympics were a huge success, but will they have a lasting impact on media representation and public perception of people with disabilities?
Alice Maynard, the chairwoman of the disability charity Scope, has said that she thinks that not only the athletes, but the many disabled pundits and presenters are a positive representation of disability. She is quoted as saying "They'll be seen as authority figures; the ones doing the explaining, teasing out the technicalities". This kind of representation is one that we are not used to seeing in the media, usually disabled people are portrayed as simply victims of their disability - people to be pitied, or people who can't do things for themselves. In the respect, Paralympic coverage was definitely a positive example of media representation and I think it will make a different to how disabled people are viewed by society.
However, there are also dangers that come with coverage of such a specific event. Not all disabled people are able to, or would want to, take part in events like the Paralympic. Just as Olympic athletes do not represent the general population, Paralympic athletes do not represent everybody with a disability. Baroness Grey Thompson has pointed out that 'The Paralympics is the fairy-dust we sprinkle on life as a disabled person, it shows a snapshot in time of some extraordinary people who train very hard, who are good at sport'. There is a worry that the amazing Paralympic athletes may further the myth that disabled people who are unable to work are actually just 'lazy' or 'benefit scroungers'. In this way, the coverage of the Paralympics may not be as valuable as first though, unless it is followed by more disability coverage in the media; one that includes a variety of different people with different situations.
I think that the Paralympics were a very positive representation of people with disabilities, however as I previously stated, they only represented a minority of disabled people. On the other hand, I think that the coverage has removed some of the stigma as far as talking about disability goes, and this may open a door for more open conversation and therefore a better understanding of the issue. Overall, I hope that the Paralympic coverage has brought about a change in media representation of disability. I would like to see disabled people featured in media programmes across the board, not just on those that are about disability. This may help to remove the 'them and us' attitude that I think has dominated media coverage of disability in the past.
Alice Maynard, the chairwoman of the disability charity Scope, has said that she thinks that not only the athletes, but the many disabled pundits and presenters are a positive representation of disability. She is quoted as saying "They'll be seen as authority figures; the ones doing the explaining, teasing out the technicalities". This kind of representation is one that we are not used to seeing in the media, usually disabled people are portrayed as simply victims of their disability - people to be pitied, or people who can't do things for themselves. In the respect, Paralympic coverage was definitely a positive example of media representation and I think it will make a different to how disabled people are viewed by society.
However, there are also dangers that come with coverage of such a specific event. Not all disabled people are able to, or would want to, take part in events like the Paralympic. Just as Olympic athletes do not represent the general population, Paralympic athletes do not represent everybody with a disability. Baroness Grey Thompson has pointed out that 'The Paralympics is the fairy-dust we sprinkle on life as a disabled person, it shows a snapshot in time of some extraordinary people who train very hard, who are good at sport'. There is a worry that the amazing Paralympic athletes may further the myth that disabled people who are unable to work are actually just 'lazy' or 'benefit scroungers'. In this way, the coverage of the Paralympics may not be as valuable as first though, unless it is followed by more disability coverage in the media; one that includes a variety of different people with different situations.
I think that the Paralympics were a very positive representation of people with disabilities, however as I previously stated, they only represented a minority of disabled people. On the other hand, I think that the coverage has removed some of the stigma as far as talking about disability goes, and this may open a door for more open conversation and therefore a better understanding of the issue. Overall, I hope that the Paralympic coverage has brought about a change in media representation of disability. I would like to see disabled people featured in media programmes across the board, not just on those that are about disability. This may help to remove the 'them and us' attitude that I think has dominated media coverage of disability in the past.
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Exam Question - Disability in the media
Discuss how one or more groups of people are represented
through the media.
With the recent Paralympic games fresh in the minds of the
public, issues surrounding disability are currently in the media spotlight.
Never have people with disability been so represented on our TV screens, and
never have they been so praised for their acheivements. However, there is
debate as to whether the impact of the Paralympic games will be as positive as
first thought.
Before the Paralympics, many disabled people thought that
the public had a negative impression of them. The media focus on welfare cuts
means that a majority of the coverage of disability on TV was linked to benefit
fraud, causing a stereotype that disabled people are too lazy to work. Peter
White, the BBC’s disability correspondant, points out that ‘They cite
government plans to cut welfare benefits, and the media coverage accompanying
it which often allies "disabled" to "benefit scrounger"’.
However, with the Paralympics being so highly covered in the
media, it was hoped that this negative public opinion could be transformed into
a positive one. The International Paralympic Commitee recently revealed that the 2012 Paralympics had broke online records, with 2 million people visiting their website during the event and a 50% increase in Twitter followers. There is no doubt the Paralympics were a huge success, but will they have a lasting impact on media representation and public perception of people with disabilities?
Alice Maynard, the chairwoman of the disability charity Scope, has said that she thinks that not only the athletes, but the many disabled pundits and presenters are a positive representation of disability. She is quoted as saying "They'll be seen as authority figures; the ones doing the explaining, teasing out the technicalities". This kind of representation is one that we are not used to seeing in the media, usually disabled people are portrayed as simply victims of their disability - people to be pitied, or people who can't do things for themselves. In the respect, Paralympic coverage was definitely a positive example of media representation and I think it will make a different to how disabled people are viewed by society.
However, there are also dangers that come with coverage of such a specific event. Not all disabled people are able to, or would want to, take part in events like the Paralympic. Just as Olympic athletes do not represent the general population, Paralympic athletes do not represent everybody with a disability. Baroness Grey Thompson has pointed out that 'The Paralympics is the fairy-dust we sprinkle on life as a disabled person, it shows a snapshot in time of some extraordinary people who train very hard, who are good at sport'. There is a worry that the amazing Paralympic athletes may further the myth that disabled people who are unable to work are actually just 'lazy' or 'benefit scroungers'. In this way, the coverage of the Paralympics may not be as valuable as first though, unless it is followed by more disability coverage in the media; one that includes a variety of different people with different situations.
I think that the Paralympics were a very positive representation of people with disabilities, however as I previously stated, they only represented a minority of disabled people. On the other hand, I think that the coverage has removed some of the stigma as far as talking about disability goes, and this may open a door for more open conversation and therefore a better understanding of the issue. Overall, I hope that the Paralympic coverage has brought about a change in media representation of disability. I would like to see disabled people featured in media programmes across the board, not just on those that are about disability. This may help to remove the 'them and us' attitude that I think has dominated media coverage of disability in the past.
Alice Maynard, the chairwoman of the disability charity Scope, has said that she thinks that not only the athletes, but the many disabled pundits and presenters are a positive representation of disability. She is quoted as saying "They'll be seen as authority figures; the ones doing the explaining, teasing out the technicalities". This kind of representation is one that we are not used to seeing in the media, usually disabled people are portrayed as simply victims of their disability - people to be pitied, or people who can't do things for themselves. In the respect, Paralympic coverage was definitely a positive example of media representation and I think it will make a different to how disabled people are viewed by society.
However, there are also dangers that come with coverage of such a specific event. Not all disabled people are able to, or would want to, take part in events like the Paralympic. Just as Olympic athletes do not represent the general population, Paralympic athletes do not represent everybody with a disability. Baroness Grey Thompson has pointed out that 'The Paralympics is the fairy-dust we sprinkle on life as a disabled person, it shows a snapshot in time of some extraordinary people who train very hard, who are good at sport'. There is a worry that the amazing Paralympic athletes may further the myth that disabled people who are unable to work are actually just 'lazy' or 'benefit scroungers'. In this way, the coverage of the Paralympics may not be as valuable as first though, unless it is followed by more disability coverage in the media; one that includes a variety of different people with different situations.
I think that the Paralympics were a very positive representation of people with disabilities, however as I previously stated, they only represented a minority of disabled people. On the other hand, I think that the coverage has removed some of the stigma as far as talking about disability goes, and this may open a door for more open conversation and therefore a better understanding of the issue. Overall, I hope that the Paralympic coverage has brought about a change in media representation of disability. I would like to see disabled people featured in media programmes across the board, not just on those that are about disability. This may help to remove the 'them and us' attitude that I think has dominated media coverage of disability in the past.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)